(11-12-2023, 01:43 PM)mikesez Wrote:

(11-12-2023, 10:28 AM)Lucky2Last Wrote: But you're actually not very smart.

This thread isn't about me.  Do you want it to be?

---

(11-12-2023, 11:39 AM)p_rushing Wrote: They will fight it and try to rely on no cameras in federal court.


If someone actually sued all the reps that don't live in their district, a lot of people in congress would no longer have jobs.

Sent from my SM-S901U using Tapatalk

Per the US Constitution, you only have to live in the state, not necessarily the district within the state.  Some states add that you have to live in the district on top of that, but Florida and many others do not.  Florida requires that state legislature members each live in their district before they can qualify to run, however, that requirement isn't there for members of US Congress from Florida.

 https://dos.fl.gov/elections/contacts/fr...andidates/

I guess you think people actually live in their states. Many of the democrats live in DC and don't actually spend enough time at home to qualify as it being their home. Yes different states have different laws so it's not a problem in some states but there would be issues for a large number of people in Congress.

When the California Senator that lives in Maryland was appointed, there was a list of lists of the well known democrats that keep token homes in their district/state but everyone knows they don't live there. Shifty even has taxes and mortgage docs saying his primary residence is in DC.

Sent from my SM-T970 using Tapatalk

---