The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show significantly less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show significantly less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.
Mike Caldwell Discussion Thread (Terminated)
|
12-06-2023, 10:21 AM
(This post was last modified: 12-06-2023, 10:39 AM by Jaguarmeister. Edited 7 times in total.)
(12-06-2023, 09:04 AM)Caldrac Wrote:(12-05-2023, 11:36 PM)Jaguarmeister Wrote: To the bolded, I've rewatched the first half this evening and saw Doug's comment and Joe Buck said 67 yards rushing actually for the Bengals at the half I believe. Here's the thing, we've been averaging giving up like 72 yards on the ground per game not including QB scrambles, so it was kind of already obvious and a big deal to Doug that they were gashing us on the ground which was by extension providing better down and distance situations for them in the passing game. Our defense has given up yardage through the air all year and that never set up the run for anyone else. Something else was up in the run game on Monday night. Maybe Zac had some blocking schemes we weren't prepared for, or there was lack of effort (there sure seemed to be in some areas), or lack of adjustments by Caldwell or something else, but them running the ball effectively certainly helped Browning. The idea about committing to stopping the run is that many more bad things can happen for an offense when the ball is in the air or in the process of being in the air (tipped balls, interceptions, sacks, etc.) It should be a little easier to defend the pass when you've effectively said "no sir" to their running game. We're good at stopping the run. They weren't a good running team coming in. That got flipped on its head in the first half and coach recognized it as the problem it was. Unfortunately it continued in the 2nd half. Campbell being terrible and their receiving corps being top notch certainly helped Browning and their passing game, but shutting down the run as we have done consistently this year would have absolutely made things easier for us and harder on him. EDIT: Yeah in retrospect, our pass defense in the 1st half was exceptionally bad. It wasn't bend don't break, it was just broken. The series to start the 2nd quarter Browning hit on 4 of 5 passes for a total of 80 yards in chunks of 14 to 25 yards each which marched them down the field for their first TD. And then obviously the failure of Campbell 1 on 1 with no help against Chase early in the 3rd which led to a long and quick TD. Despite the defensive woes, had Lawrence not gone out I think we win the game though and I don't say that to disparage CJ as I think he played admirably all things considered. |
Users browsing this thread: |
2 Guest(s) |
The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.