(01-02-2024, 08:15 PM)AnOldBrownie Wrote: Hold up. Are people suggesting Josh should be getting TJ money?

This year their numbers are comperable, and Josh will get paid as a top 10 edge rusher, but until he proves otherwise with consistency, Josh is not = TJ Watt.

This season? ok.

Yes they are suggesting Allen be the top paid DE/LB. It's crazy but they don't care if the team can't fill OL, DL, other LB, etc holes because they want to pay Allen top money for 1 season. They are probably the same ones who wanted to pay the last Jags DE to hit the market.

Sent from my SM-T970 using Tapatalk

---

(01-02-2024, 01:27 PM)NYC4jags Wrote:

(01-02-2024, 01:05 PM)p_rushing Wrote: Watt has been injured again, so I doubt the snap counts are the same. It's also why I think they need an out in the deal.

The whole question will be how much money he wants. If you can get 2 starters for his cost, it becomes a discussion.

Sent from my SM-S901U using Tapatalk

Josh has played 81% of the  Jags defensive snaps (831)

Watt has played 84% of the stillers defensive snaps (901) 
(he has started every game) 

So - actually - Josh Allen has essentially equalled his stats despite having a much lower snap count. 

Give #41 seventy more snaps and he could easily be tied or ahead in every category.

Watt has been hurt all of Dec. but is still playing. If he has more snaps, it just makes him more valuable than Allen since you need a backup for Allen.

Sent from my SM-T970 using Tapatalk

---