(01-09-2024, 01:07 PM)Jaguarmeister Wrote:

(01-09-2024, 01:00 PM)ChrisJagBoy Wrote: It's okay if you want to say his injuries affected his play, but then shouldn't we start with New Orleans instead of the Bungles? Cause he came out and had a pretty good game directly after his first injury. But I guess that dosen't fit the narrative. 

You can argue his stats were slightly worse post-injury, but what you refuse to admit is that his stats pre-injury were also terrible. 

This is a passing league, and you got 10 TDs and 13 turnovers through 10 games? I mean come on.

Now all injuries are the same?  And now I've said he wasn't underwhelming on the year?   You're flailing dude.  Just concede the point that something made him play worse after the Bengals game and move on.  Like I said, I don't care if you assign it to the high ankle sprain.  You took issue with that point and have now sunk to the bottom of the Atlantic trying to plug all the holes in your logic.  Come up for air.

Because the point being made by many here, not specfically yourself was that his injuries are what caused his "downward spiral" and caused us to go from 8-3 to 9-8 when he's been effectively the same guy all year and the difference was the defense not him. 

Some people here actually think he was elite and the reason we were 8-3 even tho he had something like 12 tds 7 ints 7 fumbles around that record. Laughable.

---