(01-09-2024, 04:42 PM)PV=nRT Wrote:

(01-09-2024, 04:34 PM)ChrisJagBoy Wrote: So you're telling me that taking the ball away and giving your offense extra drives is not going to help the team score?

These stats you provided just prove my point with Tua/Purdy/Allen etc. The outlier teams are the ones who either have a QB with 100+ rushing attempts  fields/lamarr or a team with no true starter jets/cle/NYG


Try again.

I'm saying that there is no statistical correlation between a takeaways and a teams ranking in passing offense.   That is determined by a combination of OL, QB, WR, coaching and SOS of defenses faced.   How does a team rank top 10 in passing if their OL is terrible, if the QB is "hardly a factor", if the OC needs to be replaced, if the defenses faced were above average, and if the WR corps that played were mediocre at best?   

Seems that QB carried a lot of the teams weight on his shoulders.

Because you're basing it on yards, not YPA. 

It's fairly obvious someone with more attempts is going to have more yards. Nobody is saying he can't complete a football pass. What you're saying would be like me saying "trevor lawrence had 4,000 yards in 17 games and so and so had 3,999 yards in 15 games so Trevors better.

He had more oppurtunities because we LEAD THE LEAGUE in turnovers in week 12, and his stats fell off a cliff when the defense stopped giving us extra oppurtunities which leads back to the point of the thread, which was HIS INJURIES DID NOT CHANGE OUR ABILITY TO WIN THE DEFENSE DID.

Our PPG
YPG
and Wins/losses

ALL got worse after week 12, in week 12 we had 25 takeaways, we ended the season with 27.

Direct correlation bruh.

---