(01-09-2024, 04:46 PM)ChrisJagBoy Wrote:

(01-09-2024, 04:42 PM)PV=nRT Wrote: I'm saying that there is no statistical correlation between a takeaways and a teams ranking in passing offense.   That is determined by a combination of OL, QB, WR, coaching and SOS of defenses faced.   How does a team rank top 10 in passing if their OL is terrible, if the QB is "hardly a factor", if the OC needs to be replaced, if the defenses faced were above average, and if the WR corps that played were mediocre at best?   

Seems that QB carried a lot of the teams weight on his shoulders.

Because you're basing it on yards, not YPA. 

It's fairly obvious someone with more attempts is going to have more yards. Nobody is saying he can't complete a football pass. What you're saying would be like me saying "trevor lawrence had 4,000 yards in 17 games and so and so had 3,999 yards in 15 games so Trevors better.

He had more oppurtunities because we LEAD THE LEAGUE in turnovers in week 12, and his stats fell off a cliff when the defense stopped giving us extra oppurtunities which leads back to the point of the thread, which was HIS INJURIES DID NOT CHANGE OUR ABILITY TO WIN THE DEFENSE DID.

Our PPG
YPG
and Wins/losses

ALL got worse after week 12, in week 12 we had 25 takeaways, we ended the season with 27.

Direct correlation bruh.

TLaw. 7.1 YPA
PMah. 7.0 YPA


So you are saying TLaw is better than Mahomes .   Yabut, yabut, yabut.  ? 

You keep trying to move the goal posts because you struck out on your original narrative.   A QB who is "hardly a factor" is not going to rank top 10 in passing yards (8th in attempts)  playing behind a terrible OL with a bad OC against better than average PASS defenses with average receivers.  ?

---