(03-18-2024, 06:20 PM)Ronster Wrote:

(03-18-2024, 06:14 PM)flgatorsandjags Wrote: Would rather a shutdown corner on a rookie deal and draft a WR.

Why draft a receiver? We don’t draft good receivers, never have… And again, Baalke, that dude is a wild card, he will fall in love with some linebacker and draft him at 1

No, you get the guy that can play number one receiver, he’s a very good player, hustling, moving, great route runner, gets open… oh, and actually can catch the damn ball…

And maybe we can throw a tarp joke in while we're digging up old tropes. Maybe a tired line about ACLs?

How did KC do with a bunch of young, unproven receivers this last season? They didn't seem to miss Hill too much, from what I saw.

Take care of the cap. Why you think SFO is willing to part with the guy, if #1 receivers are so valuable to an offense?

---

(03-18-2024, 06:24 PM)Protozoa Wrote:

(03-18-2024, 06:20 PM)Ronster Wrote: Why draft a receiver? We don’t draft good receivers, never have… And again, Baalke, that dude is a wild card, he will fall in love with some linebacker and draft him at 1

No, you get the guy that can play number one receiver, he’s a very good player, hustling, moving, great route runner, gets open… oh, and actually can catch the damn ball…

Yeah this is my confusion with some people on this board. They say Baalke sucks and will screw up the pick at 17 but also don't think we should trade pick 17 for a proven player and should stay put.

Which first rounder has he whiffed on? Or are you(or everyone else) confusing him with Caldwell?

---