(03-30-2024, 11:03 AM)Jag149 Wrote: BPA vs need draft discussion season firing up right on time. It does give the anti-Baalkie crowd a chance to take a few shots.  The  Muma pick was a strict BPA pick. Baalkie said as much when interviewed after the draft. So on the surface the BPAc rowd should put that in the plus column.  Personally I am neither BPA or needs drafting. Maybe call it relative BPA.

I’m not need or BPA drafting. I’m more about value.

And there was no value in selecting Muma at pick 70. There’s no chance he was rated that much higher than other players at positions that could have helped the Jags. The best case for Muma would have been for Foye or Lloyd to get hurt so he could actually see the field.

At this point, he’s a wasted top 70 pick. They’ll need to figure out if they want to re sign him without ever actually seeing him on the field.

---