(04-27-2024, 05:46 PM)Craigukjag Wrote:

(04-27-2024, 05:41 PM)Caldrac Wrote: Because the value was better earlier at positions of need where we lack depth.

Lawrence was sacked 35 times last year. He sustained injuries to his knee, his ankle, his throwing shoulder and then his head.

Our best 5 didn't start until the season finale. Our overall inability to run the football and protect him cost us tremendously in that 1 - 5 collapse.

Adding Morse and Foster just doesn't cut it. The problem I have is that, they double dipped at DT after signing Armstead.

They double dipped at CB after sigining Darby. Why didn't they apply the same principles here to the OL room?

Just seems like we're asking for trouble.

Sent from my SM-S906U using Tapatalk

Look I understand the offensive line comments I really do I agree we need to get better, but weather we like it or not they have there starting 5, we then have walker little, cooper hodges fortner and foster, who will definitely be on the roster, that’s 9 line man with out the other veterans that will float around camp, they clearly don’t think the offensive lineman left can compete with them, and they’re probably right at this stage of the draft

That's fine. When we're crying for the 2nd year in a row like the Bengals fanbase does for Burrow because the depth is garbage?

We can all circle back to last year's off season and this off season. Just feels like we did very little to improve the base five and the depth behind it.

No room to compete? They have finished in the cellar for three straight years in a row as a unit. Plenty of room to improve there.

Sent from my SM-S906U using Tapatalk

---