The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show significantly less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show significantly less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.
Let's Talk About- Political Edition
|
06-11-2024, 06:58 PM
(This post was last modified: 06-11-2024, 07:10 PM by Jaguarmeister. Edited 2 times in total.)
(06-11-2024, 04:43 PM)mikesez Wrote:(06-11-2024, 04:16 PM)Sneakers Wrote: Don't you think the burden of proof to support a charge of insurrection should be a little higher than what a handful of people thought his tweets meant? They also had to amend the law and clarify what the role of the VP is during certification after the fact. Why on earth would they need to do that? You know why, but you won't admit it. Trump's plan for that day was a bad idea, but it was not a crime. He rallied a crowd to peacefully protest at the capitol in an effort to visibly show Pence the level of support he had and to sway him to do something that was, as written at the time, a gray area but also clearly political suicide for Pence. I don't blame him for not going along even though I'm highly suspicious of the election day result. And even if fraudulent votes weren't significant enough to move the needle, the Dems and their leftist judges still changed election law in swing states in the 11th hour while early voting was going on to extend the deadline for mail in votes. That's complete [BLEEP] and probably did impact the results in swing states. Intent matters though. I don't believe Trump's intent was for violence of any kind and nothing he said given the full context in the lead up or on that day supports the idea that he intended to incite violence. If intent doesn't matter, you're essentially outlawing anyone from rallying a crowd with the intent to peacefully protest and that is very un-American. Prosecute the bad actors. If there is proof of a conspiracy and that directives were given to bad actors in the crowd from Trump or his camp, then investigate and throw the book at him. Otherwise, drop the left-wing, faux outrage nonsense. We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today! |
Users browsing this thread: |
8 Guest(s) |
The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.