(08-30-2024, 06:31 PM)p_rushing Wrote:

(08-30-2024, 06:04 PM)Jag149 Wrote: Really do not know details, but can make a judgement? Did they get pictures of the damage the assault did, or did someone just give the person $1000 to say they were assaulted? How you can assume based on no details it is amazing. Guy did something nice for the guys the current administration abandoned, that is the real issue for the Democrats. They want it to go away.  Kind of like when Hillary abandoned the guys in Benghazi. When questioned said what does it matter now their dead. I wonder if the people in the background of every political ad have signed waivers for the use of their likeness?

From what was reported, MSM claims the person with the mental disorder was assaulted when they tried to stop video/pictures from being taken. Ok, so a complaint was filed then dropped the next day. If there were any way to prove the story Jack Smith would have filed more charges, so (as you say) we can assume the complaint was found to be not valid.

I haven't seen anyone release more info than that other than the families say Trump was invited and Trump has released the permission he had. Trump's team says they have the video but haven't released that. So the video that was released was not taken by Trump's people.

The video of Trump that was released showed him visiting a graveside and calling the family as they were not able to attend. He also took pictures with the families that were there. Shame on him that people wanted to take pictures with him LOL

Sent from my SM-T970 using Tapatalk