(09-17-2024, 04:01 PM)imtheblkranger Wrote:

(09-17-2024, 03:19 PM)NYC4jags Wrote: The difference between 2022 and 2023 was minuscule. 
Very little changed offensively. 
The OL got worse in the run game by a pretty wide margin. 
That was the biggest difference. 
Everything else stayed mostly the same. 

Now, if you want to go back to 30% more  of the mesh concept quick release passes, screens, and end-arounds while cutting back on the freshly added snaps under center and PA downfield passes, that's your prerogative. 

I personally like where we are headed with the more aggressive 2024 play calling changes. I think it'll be glorious if they can hit on 2 or 3 more of those chunk plays per game than they are currently able. I'm stoked we are trying it more frequently.
Just haven't been able to execute enough of them yet.

This part I 100% am in agreement with.

I would like to go back to more of the quick release passes. 2nd and 3? I'd rather a quick pass than try to bully ourselves up the middle over and over that's not working. Just take the training wheels off Trevor for once.

Also though, maybe all of this gripe can be mitigated if they can get the play calls in with time to make adjustments at the line

Like the two 3rd and shorts they threw in the fins game that got dropped? Like the TD in the skidmarks game that got called back for procedure? I see those things your asking for, I just am not seeing them executed very well.

---

(09-17-2024, 04:16 PM)Cleatwood Wrote:

(09-17-2024, 02:57 PM)flsprtsgod Wrote: We've literally gone from a 1 win season to two winning seasons to "Let's fire the coach" in two games. People have completely lost their damn minds.

This is with the caveat that they're 4-7.

If they're 4-7, and you don't see a significant change, you're keeping him for the 24/25 season?

Goodness yes. I'm taking my time machine for a spin and firing Baalke in 2021. Or at the bye when they're 4-7, that would work too.

---

(09-17-2024, 04:24 PM)Caldrac Wrote:

(09-17-2024, 04:16 PM)Cleatwood Wrote: This is with the caveat that they're 4-7.

If they're 4-7, and you don't see a significant change, you're keeping him for the 24/25 season?

I am keeping Doug. I am not keeping:

Rauscher
Baalke
Taylor

If Doug is adamant about Taylor staying? It's on a short leash if I am Khan and there's a six game stipulation. If Taylor's offense is garbage after six weeks? He's demoted and Doug has to call the offense from start to finish.

I want Baalke gone though. If the offensive line finishes in that 26th or worse ranking area again? His philosophy of drafting LB's and RB's in premium rounds can be packed to be shown the door with him.

I would hire a VP of Football Operations with that person having the ability to hire their own General Manager. Doug is given 2025 to get it together or he's gone.

I would be eyeing Thomas Dimitroff, Rick Spielman or Rick Smith for the VP role personally. I would have already hired and begged Bill Belichick to be a high level consultant at the minimum.

Sent from my SM-S906U using Tapatalk

What's Belichick going to consult on? He was a terrible personnel man and his in game work was getting pretty bad at the end of Brady's time there. I think he's overrated.

---