(12-28-2024, 12:43 AM)mikesez Wrote:

(12-27-2024, 11:50 PM)Jag149 Wrote: Hoo boy what a rabbit hole. The suggestion is we FORCE someone to sell an asset of theirs. What if the person renting it doesn't want to, it could be the business they use to support their family? Is the plan to seize the house to ensure compliance? ? Tell me no firearms are involved at least. I believe the constitution would need to be changed to allow this. Then it would open the government up to being able to force people to sell assets they deem excessive.  Quite a slippery slope there.

Now these resource hogs. We would need to establish a limit to the number of homes one person could have right?  I can see all this working in places like China, Venezuela, Russia, 1930's Germany, yea piece of cake.

Just my opinion...

Your reading comprehension is not great today.
The idea is to make an offer of sale part of every lease of a single family, free standing home. The only person who would be eligible to buy it would be the tenant, and only at the end of the lease term.  No force required.  The tenant would already be there and would already have the keys.  They would just have to take out a mortgage and pay the landlord the full price for the home, if they wanted to exercise the option.