(01-16-2025, 05:49 PM)mikesez Wrote:

(01-16-2025, 02:58 PM)Jag149 Wrote: LOL this is why I do not play chess with pigeons. They walk around, mess up the board, then strut like they did something. lol

Why are you allowed to criticize California's park land management when you won't allow me to criticize California's zoning?  It's hypocrisy.

You are welcome to criticize them. We were discussing the reason for the fire. The root cause was not zoning, it was not executing simple land management processes for many years. Money needed to do this was diverted to other agendas that in the end put the public at risk. There was also a break down in the initial response to the first fire.  

This is not the first time you have tried to "steer" conversations to how people zone property. I have no idea nor care to know why you have the need to promote multi family zoning. If you want to discuss zoning and how that is done why don't you begin a thread on that? You can pontificate all you want. Zoning had very, very little impact on the fire. You may disagree, but it is kind of a silly thing to think in my opinion.

ps, you do know most can see your attempts to steer conversations right?

---