(4 hours ago)Sneakers Wrote:

(05-04-2025, 06:18 PM)mikesez Wrote: Finally you're asking the real questions!
It may not always be clear cut which countries offer due process to criminals and which don't.  While a jury is a key part of our system, most of the world uses Napoleonic based systems that don't rely on juries.  Napoleonic systems can easily be corrupted, but so can jury based systems, most famously in the Jim Crow South.  Suppose there was a foreign country operating somewhere on earth that was an exact copy of Mississippi in the 1930s. It might be OK to deport a white person back to such a place, but not a black person.  We would have to judge it case by case, we would have to develop guidelines.  
It's above my pay grade, and it's above yours.
Immigration judges work on this stuff every day and they know what to do.

And as usual, you're unable to provide any substantive answers.  Millions of immigrants and the best you can suggest is to evaluate countries acceptable for deportation on a case-by-case basis.  LOL, they'll die of old age before their cases are heard.  Will they be jailed pending their hearings?  Will they be represented by legal counsel?  Do you have a vision of your own, or are you just regurgitating the party rhetoric?

We should never have let it get this bad. We should have made it easier to immigrate legally.  We should have had real punishments for people who hired illegal labor. We can still do both of these things today.
But violating the Constitution to "fix" the problem is like throwing a brick at a window to kill a fly.

---