(05-06-2025, 09:17 PM)mikesez Wrote:

(05-06-2025, 08:58 PM)Sneakers Wrote: So now it's about the process used to deport him, NOT the country we deported him to.  (And I thought Jello was squishy.)  So, if we give him an "adequate" hearing, you're okay with deportation to El Salvador?

BTW, it you can't even define what an "adequate" process is, how can you say his was inadequate?

It's both.  Both the process and the country.
An adequate process would have said, "El Salvador is going to imprison him without trial, so let's send him somewhere else."
What happened was, we rounded him up, we called El Salvador, and we said, "we got a member of one of your gangs." We had never had any kind of a trial related to that.  We just accused him, and didn't give him an opportunity to contest it. We shouldn't do that.  But even so, given he was an illegal immigrant, it *could have been* OK to deport him if we knew El Salvador was going to let him be free or at least give him a trial.  We knew they weren't.  We shouldn't have deported him at that time to that place.  It was wrong.