(05-07-2025, 11:15 AM)flsprtsgod Wrote:

(05-07-2025, 10:55 AM)mikesez Wrote: The 5th applies to what the US government can not do to any person, anywhere. Its language is super clear on this point.
The part our courts question is, what is due process and what isn't.  But they don't question the principle that our government shall not deprive any person, citizen or not, of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law.

Like those who can't define a woman, we seem to be dealing with those who can't identify "due process" but are absolutely certain it just didn't happen.

I didn't like Justice Jackson's answer either.  
She said "I am not a biologist." She's not, but she should be able to sort out a legal definition of female and whether laws using that definition are applied correctly and whether they are constitutional or not.
That said, all 9 justices on the Supreme Court would agree that "It is hard to define due process, but it's our job, and we've done it many times."
There's substantiative due process, procedural due process, etc.  I don't have to be able to explain it to you.

---