The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show significantly less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show significantly less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.
Let's Talk About- Political Edition
|
07-02-2025, 11:23 AM
(This post was last modified: 07-02-2025, 11:29 AM by mikesez. Edited 1 time in total.)
(07-01-2025, 08:16 PM)The Drifter Wrote: This is why we need term limits....... Term limits, or the lack of them, have nothing to do with the filibuster or the CBA of 1974. The CBA of 1974 is not compulsory by the way. A basic principle of US Constitutional Law is that each chamber makes its own rules and a past Congress cannot bind a future Congress.
My fellow southpaw Mark Brunell will probably always be my favorite Jaguar.
|
Users browsing this thread: |
2 Guest(s) |
The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.