Quote:What I find interesting is that you could have just let this idiocy slide off the first page so people weren't scoffing at you, but you felt compelled to bump it for no other reason than to make sure everyone gets the point that you want to trade the only veteran receiver on the roster.  The same receiver the team has made a priority to re-sign this off season, a year ahead of the end of his contract. 

 

Some people just need to relish in their ignorance.  Knock yourself out.

Speaking of ignorance.... more veiled insults from an "administrator" who holds others to such a high standard on board rules.

 

Once again, we know you didn't come up with the suggestion, and you don't think it is a good idea, so obviously in your mind it is "ignorance".  Several people people have not "scoffed" at the idea, and they see the logic in it.  Of course they don't have a personal agenda against me going back years, as you seem to have.

 

They might re-sign Shorts, but I will be surprised if it is not a trade-friendly deal, leaving open the possibility of moving him later or next year.

 

By the way, you're the one who is keeping the thread on the front page with your need to reply every time I post.

 

Feel free to stop posting in the thread any time if it is so ignorant.  Your ridicule and insults won't be missed.

---