Quote:And I FULLY UNDERSTAND Henne played well, but he does this. It's his problem. He is never consistent enough. What I'm saying is that I feel more comfortable with Bortles playing the whole game rather than Henne. Henne was due for some bad plays.

Sorry brotha, but "homeboy" is right on this one!

No, you're not. Henne got us 13, Bortles got us 6, guys who won't have jobs next week got us none and gave up 14. You, homeboy, are wrong. Whether you feel comfortable or not with Bortles starting, it was neither Bortles or Henne who lost that game for us. Bortles starting would have made no difference in the outcome because neither Bortles or Henne ended that game. If Henne came in the game and put up 6 points and then watched out third stringers give up point like we did, it would still make no different if Bortles or Henne started, brotha. You, quite honestly, FULLY MISUNDERSTOOD me. Evidence by the fact that you're still talking about being comfortable with Bortles starting affecting the outcome,



Edit: I'm not arguing whether or not a ortles is better or if Henne is consistent or not. My point is, our first teamer whooped their first teamers and their tired stringers whooped ours. Preseason doesn't mean a damn thing. Henne or Bortles starting, our third stringers were good enough to finish

---