Quote:I feel like you will regret this answer.

 

 

Quote:Wow

 

 

Quote:Anyone would think franchise qbs grow on trees. After 2 top ten busts and a decade of mediocre to awful qb play, he wants to trade away our potential superstar qb...

 

Want to trade away our franchise QB? Uh, no. 

 

I was asked a question and answered it honestly, unlike some of you when posed with questions. 

 

In that trade scenario question one side is getting a DE prospect that is thought of as a once in a decade or 2 prospect. The same side is also getting 2 QB, one I think very highly of as a potential franchise QB and a developmental QB prospect. 

 

The other side is getting a single player in Bortles, who yes, I think very highly of after watching his play this pre-season, but we also have to remember he hasn't played a single regular season snap yet. We can't just act like a John Elway-like career for Bortles is imminent. We don't know. Lots of variables need to be played out. He could get hurt. My accepting that trade is more about the odds of success for the one side of the trade over the other. More players = more chance for success. Will all 3 become top AFC talent? Maybe not. but 2 of the 3 would be a reasonable estimate. 

 

I think its funny that people are trying to make this out as if I'm spearheading some sort of effort to deal Bortles here because thats not true. I simply answered a question. But some of you are like a lynch mob. 

 

 

Quote:TMD,

 

Would you at least admit you severely overvalued Mallet in terms of market value?

 

Yes, but at least in recent weeks/ month I have not been stating that it would still take the 2nd rounder to fetch Mallett. I figiured by this point once Garoppolo started to shine that it was going to lower what the Pats could get in a trade for Mallett since everyone knew that they'd now be more apt to want to move him. They didn't want to have to keep 3 QB on the active roster for long. 

 

Quote:My sarcasm meter just broke. Is trolling to this degree allowed?

 

Answering a question is now "trolling"? :wacko:

 

You people are nuts. 

---