Quote:Wow. You just want to keep beating a dead horse, huh?  The only thing you've informed me of was the sack numbers for the jets aforementioned trio. 

 

BTW  - One of the outside linebackers in the Jets scheme often functions almost almost exactly like our LEO.  Please stop with the high and mighty act.  Seriously - I understand the role of the LBs in a 3-4.   Stop being a jerk.

 

And I'll continue to credit Richardson and Wilkerson for pressure they and LB's get. They collapse the pocket, move the QB off his spot and Wilkerson often gets sacks in the process.  He just hasn't had that many this year.  Sometimes the other LBs benefit - sometimes they make great plays. 

Both their OLBs have a whopping 1 sack a piece so I don't know where you think they are getting this "LEO" pressure from. Our two top "LEO"s have combined for 4 sacks. Advantage jags by a big margin. Another lazy analysis. You just continue to blabber like an ignorant fool.

 

It's the successful blitzes by the LBs that don't play the "LEO" which is the difference between the pressure generated by the two units, not the play of the front 4.

 

When Wilkerson got 10.5 sacks last year, it was the first and only time any of those guys ever got more than 5.5 sacks in a season in their entire careers. So not only do you not have current evidence to back your claim that their front 4 produces more pressure but you also don't have any historical evidence to back that claim.

 

You want me to quit beating a dead horse, then quit bringing it back to life by continuing to defend your lazy assessment that has been proven over and over again to be misguided and erroneous. I'm sorry my introduction of a little fact and research blew up your little preconceived notions.

---