Quote:Both their OLBs have a whopping 1 sack a piece so I don't know where you think they are getting this "LEO" pressure from. Our two top "LEO"s have combined for 4 sacks. Advantage jags by a big margin. Another lazy analysis. You just continue to blabber like an ignorant fool.

 

It's the successful blitzes by the LBs that don't play the "LEO" which is the difference between the pressure generated by the two units, not the play of the front 4.

 

When Wilkerson got 10.5 sacks last year, it was the first and only time any of those guys ever got more than 5.5 sacks in a season in their entire careers. So not only do you not have current evidence to back your claim that their front 4 produces more pressure but you also don't have any historical evidence to back that claim.

 

You want me to quit beating a dead horse, then quit bringing it back to life by continuing to defend your lazy assessment that has been proven over and over again to be misguided and erroneous. I'm sorry my introduction of a little fact and research blew up your little preconceived notions.

LOL. I guess you win the internet and the Jets should just go ahead and trade Richardson, Wilkerson and Coples for Davis, Clemons and Branch ASAP.  ( or which ever lineman you want to trade for Wilkerson - since he lines up everywhere and causes havoc from anywhere ) 

 

"entire careers" was comical, BTW. So many years to contemplate there.   Nice job brushing 10.5 sacks under the rug as well. Cause that's obviously unimportant too.  Along with his 32 hurries that I referenced repeatedly. Guess I didn't spoon feed that one enough. 

 

Anyway - You win, bro.  I can't stomach anymore of your punk-[BLEEP]-{bad-wore-removed} garbage.  Enjoy your high horse.   I'm out and I'll bow to your infinite knowledge if it makes you feel better. 

---