Quote:NYC4jags pointed out how Bortles was looking deep when he took a sack, and he had options running deep but threw short instead.

 

Basically, he pointed out in-game evidence showing that Fisch doesn't appear to handcuff him, and he pointed to commentary after the game showing the same thing. You wont accept either one. How about you tell us what would be acceptable?

 

How is that evidence that Fisch isn't handcuffing him???

 

To be honest - maybe that supports my side even more - as in - Bortles natural instincts have him looking downfield for the deep play, and Bortles second guesses himself to attempt it, because of Fisch and Bradley railing him for the other deep INT's so now all Bortles will settle for (mostly) is the short [BAD WORD REMOVED] these past 6 Q. 

 

Boom! Instant game manager. 

---