Quote:Gus shouldn't need pro bowl level players at every position before he can win, though. 

 

Good coaching gets the absolute most out of what you already have. 

 

I don't believe that Bradley has done that. 1-6, (5-18) and a league worst point differential 2 years running is not getting the most out of the current talent base. 

 

JImmy Johnson, with a roster of largely no names in 1990 (his 2nd year) was already showing significant improvement. His defense only gave up 300 points for the season and his team finished 7-9. Gus might not even match his 4-12 from last year....Thats unacceptable. 

 

Again with the 1 bullet comparison. Have you nothing else besides that one now thoroughly brutalized equine carcass to beat? You don't get to take a one time ever event and treat it like it should be the standard for all others, and that's what that Cowboys example is. What else you got?

 

 

And Pro Bowl players at every postition? Are you serious? How about we just have a single Pro Bowler? Or heck, how about we not have first year players at more than 50% of the offensive positions? Bradley has a deck stacked against him, and everyone in the organization knows it, that's why they aren't responding with the ridiculous criticism that some on this board are. Because we all knew it would be tough going for at least 2 years with this team. For all the work you put into being the board inteligentsia, why does this simple little fact evade your notice over and over again? It's tired.

---