Quote:The agenda talk isn't about the fans that hate FSU. It's about the horrible journalism shown towards FSU and Jameis Winston in the last year. All these big time news outlets, whether it was the New York Times, ESPN, Fox Sports, etc. all LEAVE OUT very important details of the case. All these reports have been very one sided towards this so called "victim," and they have never looked at it from Jameis Winston's side. Why? Because saying something positive about Jameis isn't going to generate hits on their website nor will it generate talk. Why do they never look at both sides?

 

Then you have ESPN grasping at anything they can, like the BB gun incident, the Burger King incident, and now this autograph thing. Unless their is proof, whether it's video evidence, photos, word of mouth, etc., that he took money, why is this even being reported? It isn't against NCAA rules to sign autographs. There was a report that came out a week and a half ago saying that ESPN has as many as 47 employees covering Jameis Winston.

 

It's like they all sit around and surf the web, waiting for the next slightly negative news they can jump on. 

 

Regarding the second paragraph, how is that grasping?  They are all very easy stories and any person with any common sense knows they are true.

 

I've read those stories on ESPN, NY Times, etc....and the only reason you think they are bias is because you are an FSU fan.  I get that they didn't put some information for Jameis in the article, but who knows if they couldn't validate it...they can only write what they know. Why hasn't there been a credible story defending Jameis Winston?  Certainly there's an FSU grad with a journalism degree that could put something credible together.  I haven't seen it.

 

You are being paranoid. 

 

Now this.  http://www.usatoday.com/story/sports/nca.../18053981/

 

USA Today and other credible news outlets aren't just out there digging up dirt....this is legit crime.

---