Quote:Do good all you want to, I'm not stopping you. Forcing me to do good on your behalf isn't doing good no matter the outcome or, as I said, the ends justify the means.

You seem to only support government force when you agree with it, for example we can go back to the vaccines where you advocate forced vaccination. So I'm confused who sets the standard for when the force of government is acceptable and when it's not?


To me the only time the force of government is acceptable is to defend the life of an innocent or the private property of a citizen if we agree on that I don't see where you can justify not granting security for minors as they are the definition of innocent.


If we accept a government that forces participation why is it unacceptable to expect government to protect the most innocent when the time is needed. I'm in no way advocating government replace parents, quite contrary I fully support the parents authority which is why we disagree on forced vaccinations, but the reality is not all parents even remotely attempt to provide for their children. These children were discussing have no parental protection or guardian providing for them that's where government can play a role. No child should every be denied healthcare because of their parents or guardians ability to pay. If we're going to have a Darwinist vision of society then go all the way abolish all forms of government and institute a voluntary society.

---