Quote:Uh no.... We signed Marks to a different deal than we signed Miller. The Marks and Knighton comparison is not valid. Miller and Knighton is however, because they got deals worth the same money, for the same duration, and to play the same position. I don't have any issue with us signing Geno or Marks. My issue is with us not signing Smith or Knighton, and signing Miller.

 

I love how much you've whined in this thread.  You expected everyone to take your "evaluation" of the roster as gospel truth, and when they didn't, you felt the need to throw a fit, I guess?  You ever stated that you weren't unhappy with how things are, but you sure are pissing and moaning about it now.

 

Knighton has a whole two more sacks than Miller.  Other than that, their numbers are practically identical, and by all accounts Knighton is regressing at this point.  Is 2 sacks going to change our season?  Nope!  And the fact that you intentionally chose the less productive DT that Caldwell signed is hilarious.

 

Smith was not a long-term fixture at his position, and the Jags were outspoken about wanting him back anyway.  He picked the Ravens, and we saved money.  It's clear that out new GM is avoiding knee-jerk signings and overpriced players.  I guarantee you Smith would look less stellar than he does this year with all these rookies and stop gaps around him.

 

Overall, just quit whining and give it a while.  We're all entitled to our opinions too, and that's something you just have to deal with.  Sheesh.

---