So it is a conspiracy?  Or it isn't a conspiracy?  I'm getting really confused.

 

I mean, can conspiracies be hidden in plain sight?  That's your implication isn't it?

 

Seriously, how can you deny that you are refuting the vast majority of scientific research, then talk about conspiracy, and then hide behind the fact that the conspiracy is out in the open so therefore it's not a conspiracy?

 

It's hurting my brain trying to follow your defense of something you should just admit you said, and were wrong about.  

 

 

“NASA sponsors research into many areas of cutting-edge scientific inquiry, including the relationship between carbon dioxide and climate," the agency's chief scientist, Dr. Waleed Abdalati, told The Huffington Post in an email. "As an agency, NASA does not draw conclusions and issue 'claims' about research findings. We support open scientific inquiry and discussion...If the authors of this letter disagree with specific scientific conclusions made public by NASA scientists, we encourage them to join the debate in the scientific literature or public forums rather than restrict any discourse.”

---