Quote:Gays are not allowed to carry guns into the theater either. I don't see the dissonance. It's a policy that applies to everyone.


"No shirt, no shoes, no service." But if the restaurant has to serve black people, how come it doesn't have to serve shirtless people? Is that dissonance to you? It's not dissonance to me, because the policy applies to everyone.

I think the point he is trying to make is private property rights can't be used as an excuse to restrict access to constitutional rights while at the same time ignored in discrimination laws. If a business owner can say no weapons on my property for whatever reason why do they not have the same right to say no persons on my property for whatever reason or no lifestyle endorsements on my property for whatever reason. Personally I support letting private property function as they so choose. If a gay themed theater forbids guns I support that. For the same reason I support eliminating all discrimination laws on private property.

---