Quote:I admit that I'm no expert when it comes to accounting. But I have seen cases where perfectly legal accounting tricks have covered up losses (and profits). So just because there's no illegal accounting being found does not mean that government funding does not facilitate abortions. But even if that's true, government funding is going to a business that is performing abhorrent activities. Whether or not the informed left accepts this, a large majority of the US doesn't.


But to give you an example, how are the facilities funded? Presumably PP performs abortions in the same building that does (say) breast exams. Some of the federal funds go to the utilities and upkeep of the PP buildings. Can you really expect that PP exactly divvies up the sources of funding going to facility expenses so that no federal funds slip into the abortion side of the business?

So, in other words, you don't have any facts to substantiate you claim against pp.


You have anecdotal information about an unrelated company, and extrapolation. You created a red herring regarding property expense to indirectly and incorrectly allocate a business expense fur overhead into abortion expense. Sorry, but you are still incorrect.


Again, you are creating a false premise to rationalize a false accusation based on your political beliefs.


Again, I really enjoy debating you. You're clearly a very intelligent person. You don't have a leg to stand on in this particular circumstance.

---