Quote:The organization didn't do Garrard "dirty."  He was a disappointment, and he was hurt.  They made the decision to move on because the determination had been made that they had his replacement on the roster, and they could get the same level of output from the journeyman they'd brought in to be his backup.  Turns out they were wrong on both assumptions, but they weren't wrong about Garrard.  He never played another snap in the league, so keeping him here would have done nothing but eat up more cap space. 

 

Regarding Gabbert, I'm not sure why some here feel the need to pick at that scab.  He's been gone for a while now, and teh team is better for it.  Nothing about that is going to change as time goes by.