Quote:Huh?

 

The two have nothing to do with each other what so ever. It takes a very very large mental leap to even attempt to link the two in any way. All that has been said is that it could be a biproduct of evolution as noted by TJ due to extreme outliers in the system nobody has said evolution made them this way that I am aware of. Are you saying they are making it up as your basis for calling it a belief? 

 

 

Quote:1. How is being asked to refer to someone as "she" an insult to you and your family? To an even greater point, how is any perceived "insult" on your part not greatly outweighed by the fact that you, in refusing to address this person as who they are vs. who you see them to be, are being far more insulting and demeaning, and potentially just adding fuel to the fire for their next major depressive episode?

 

2. What if the transgirl's parents ask you to refer to her as a girl, regardless of what gender her equipment is for? Would you go out of your way to insult that girl and the wishes of her family just to prove your point?

 

3. I really don't see how evolution and creationism are the least bit involved in this. I really don't. It's almost like you're reaching for a strawman here, but only the left would ever do such a thing, right?

 

I perhaps should have phrased it differently.

 

Those on the left believe that creationism should not be taught or "accepted" because it is perceived by some to be a belief rather than actual science.  Only evolution should be taught.

 

Yet, a 13-17 year old boy (actual science, anatomy says so) who "identifies" as a girl (belief) should be accepted and treated as a girl.  So do we not teach anatomy?

---