Quote:I'll respond to the part in bold in your quote below.

 

So you ask a trans-person about themselves. their response with conviction is "this is who I am", or in reality their response is really "this is what I believe".  Does that make it fact or is that what he/she believes?  Does that over-ride the actual science that proves otherwise?

 

Ask someone that believes in Creationism and their response is with conviction "this is what I believe" or it can be said that they say "this is how I got here".  How is that different?

 

Regarding the part in bold, how is it "just who they are" when science says otherwise?  Is it because they "believe" that they are a female born in a male body or vice versa?

You really just don't understand or do not want to understand. It seems like instead of trying to understand you are merely attempting to debate your way into trying to prove you are right about.... something though I am not sure what exactly? I suggest you have an actual conversation with someone and see for yourself how misguided you are in thinking you understand. 

 

No they did not say that and they do not. YOU say that. That is your translation to help you understand something you cannot begin to understand.

 

You are still continuing the flawed argument that "science says" no science does not say either way that is blatantly false. Anatomy does not address the mind and other sciences barely understand a small portion of the mind. The entire basis for your trans vs creationism argument is flawed at it's basic level. 

---