Quote:What difference does it make?  We were getting torched anyway.  Atleast put a hurting on Brady and make him take some hits.  After enough Hits Bellicheck would of pulled him out the game or gone to the run.  Instead the team just sat back in their soft zone and gave the patriots the game.  They didn't have to earn it.

 

Say Bradley did this and he starts sending blitzes in the second half. Say theoretically, one of the LBs runs free and gets a free shot right Brady; none of the NE o-line even touches him.

 

And then Tom Terrific gets injured and misses the rest of the season. Down the road, Indy, Houston, and tenn all end up beating the pats, with the lowely Jags being the only AFCS team who loses to them. And that loss to NE ends up costing the Jags a tie-breaker somewhere down the line. Because even though Lord Brady eats blitzes for breakfast, the Jags had to show them we were there when we were down by 35+ points.

 

You'd start a thread 5 minutes after the announcement blasting Bradley for being stupid enough to risk injuring Brady when the rest of the AFCS still had to play him. Because we lost the game, I sure as [BAD WORD REMOVED] want everyone else in the AFCS to lose to the Pats too. If I can't get a Jags win on a week-to-week basis, I want the next best thing, everyone else in the AFCS to lose.

---