Create Account


Board Performance Issues We are aware of performance issues on the board and are working to resolve them! The board may be intermittently unavailable during this time. (May 07) x


The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show significantly less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.
California Becomes First State to Ban 'Redskins' Nickname

#34

Quote:Public access, equal treatment under the law, equal opportunities all of that yea. But when you tell a private individual or private business they can not refuse service for whatever reason you are now using the force of the state in a manor it was never intended.
You and I are so close on this, yet so far apart. A business that opens its doors should open its doors to everyone, period, but that business cannot be compelled to act against the owners' morals. For instance, if a gay couple walks into a conservative, religious bakery and asks for a plain white wedding cake, there is absolutely nothing objectionable about that cake, and it should be made. That said, if that same gay couple walks into that same bakery and wants a rainbow flag with the words "GAY MARRIAGE 4EVER" decorated onto it, the bakery should be within their rights to say that that message violates their personal ethics, and while the couple is welcome to choose different decorations or take a plain cake and decorate it themselves, the bakery will not fulfill that request.

 

It's along the same veins of not forcing a black-owned bakery to make a Confederate flag cake, a Jewish bakery to make a swastika cake, or expecting a Muslim bakery to make bacon-wrapped donuts. If you want to open the doors of your business, you open them to everyone, but no one should be able to force a business owner to take a special production order that would compromise their morals.

Reply


Messages In This Thread
California Becomes First State to Ban 'Redskins' Nickname - by TJBender - 10-14-2015, 07:53 PM



Users browsing this thread:
2 Guest(s)

The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.


ABOUT US
The Jungle Forums is the Jaguars' biggest fan message board. Talking about the Jags since 2006, the Jungle was the team-endorsed home of all things Jaguars.

Since 2017, the Jungle is now independent of the team but still run by the same crew. We are here to support and discuss all things Jaguars and all things Duval!