Quote:Love the revisionist history look back at Garrard.


David Garrard played for a team where if he scored 17 points he would win most of the time.


Blake plays for a team where if he scores 35 he will still lose most of his games.


Garrard had a running game and a defense. Blake has neither. And is already a better pure passer than Garrard by lightyears. In his second year.


But dream on.

Garrard had those things in 2007, but the D was gone after that. I think he was the main reason we went 7-9, and 8-8 Genes first two years. Garrard deserves more credit than he gets around here. If he had been healthy, instead of Gabbert in 2011 (which had a great D and great running game) we probably would have been in the playoffs.  Actually that thought scares me alot, cause we would probably just now be getting rid of Gene...

---