If someone has an alternative fuel source that can replace conventional fossil fuels then give me a call.  

 

As of right now, most technology is less efficient than fossil fuels and that means that it will actually take the consumption of more goods services and natural resources to bring these fuels sources to market.  This means that you will actually increase the amount of fossil fuels consumed and CO2 emitted to implement the solutions that your side advocates OR an inordinate drop in the average standard of living for citizens of this country (while the third world begins to technologically enter the global middle class and consume more goods.)

 

This isn't about short term blips of data or making ourselves feel like we are part of something. 

 

You have to MATHEMATICALLY PROVE that there is a catastrophic problem.  (There have been times in the history of the earth where there were no ice caps at all and life on the planet thrived and no one was driving hummers.)  You also have to MATHEMATICALLY PROVE that the solutions that you propose will avert the problem as wells as show how they will be sustainable over time.  

 

for 36 pages of alarmism and ranting you haven't done that and the AGC community hasn't done that.  All we see is a blind march to a command control economy that has been proven that it cannot manage resources efficiently.  

---