First of all, let me reiterate that all the libs in this forum playing the wounded statesmen is just abhorrent.  Chuck Schumer, the ascending leader of the Senate Democrats, Said in 2007... 2007 that with Democrats in power in the US senate G.W. Bush wouldn't get anymore nominees through to the high court.  Joe Biden Said the same thing about George H. W. Bush.  They said the same thing about Eisenhower.  This kind of blatant hypocrisy is frankly appalling!  

 

What about justice Kennedy?  

 

1.) Bork was qualified to serve on the high court, and his nomination was to fill a vacancy by a retiring justice who chose to have Reagan Choose his successor that was created a full 7 months before the Iowa Caucuses of the next election cycle.  

 

2.) In Justice Kennedy Democrats forced the republicans to nominate someone who was pro choice, who allowed the Affordable care act to be rewritten by the SCOTUS so that plainly illegal subsidies were kept in place and last but not least Wrote the majority opinion mandating that an institution that had never existed in the history of man, that had never carried a majority in any chamber of congress and had never been held by a president seeking office would become the law of the land for all 50 states.  

 

If you want to make a logical comparison to the nomination of Justice Kennedy then Obama would have to nominate someone who was pro life, pro traditional marriage and willing to personally write the majority opinion to declare obamacare unconstitutional.  

 

Most importantly, you have executive actions on immigration before the court, you have executive regulations on emissions before the court (that could cost average Americans thousands of dollars) and now you have a push to allow illegal aliens the right to vote.  

 

NOW IS NOT THE TIME TO APPOINT ANOTHER OBAMAITE WITH A LITTLE MODERATE GLITTER SPRINKLED ON HIM OR HER!!!!!!!!!!!!!

---