The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show significantly less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show significantly less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.
|
Malik Jackson likely hitting open market
|
Quote:Disruption is production! You have a guy that was second in the league in QB hurries last year only behind N. Suh, and ahead of dominant interior D-linemen such as Gerald McCoy, Marcel Dareus etc..., he had 5.5 sacks, that's not a number to "sneeze at" considering his position. Comparing stats is dangerous, while his "production" in numbers are similar to Odrick's, Malik Jackson is a far superior player as he consistently effects the pass game more. Considering like 15 3T/5T tweeners had higher sack numbers last year than the man that is being talked about as deserving a contract that approaches JJ Watt. He also doesn't offer the run stopping that Odrick offers as Malik Jackson managed 0 stuffs in 20 games last season. |
| Users browsing this thread: |
| 2 Guest(s) |
The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.