Quote:Yeah I don't agree with that. My only knocks against Ramsey are his tackling form, his trouble turning his head to locate the ball in go routes, and his drop INTs.

 

Which is why he I like him more as a FS, where he can keep plays in front of him more. INTs are great, but as long as he's knocking passes (which he does do a great job on) and in general making passes difficult to complete (because of his size, length, and athleticism). And while he can improve his tackling, he's still a physical hitter/tackler. I mean, I don't get it.

 

There's reason to think he can play physical corner in our scheme (because of his size, length, and athleticism). There's reason to think he can play nickel in our scheme (similar to Colvin's role, with run/blitz support). There's even a few who think he can play SS (I don't agree he'll be maximized in that role, but yeah I can see it). And of course he's being projected by many in the draft community to be an excellent FS.

 

You have a guy who has the size to play either FS/SS with the speed and coverage of a corner, the physicality and length that we ask of our corners, the play run/blitz/cover we ask of our nickel.

 

I mean, seriously, why don't people want this guy on our defense?

---