Quote:Luck had a year of eligibility, but he had been at Stanford for 4 years.  He was NOT a junior.  Bridgewater and Manziel would both be actual juniors.  Luck redshirted.  It's confusing I know.  But the argument I'm trying to make is that younger guys do not have a good track record.  Gabbert and Newton are in that group.  Leaf is in that group.  Luck is not in that group.

 

Again.  Logical Fallacy.  Correlation does not equal causation.

 

Is it more likely that they failed because they decided not to stay an extra year and came out as Junior's?

 

Or is it more likely that they failed because they didn't have the talent?  


Occam's razor.  The simplest answer is often the correct one.

---