Quote:Just got my first look at pre-season publications. Both Lindy's and Athlons picked the Jaguars for 3rd place behind the Texans and Colts. The only position group rated very high were the wide-receivers. On the one hand, I can understand that this team must first prove it on the field after so many terrible seasons, however I don't think they are factoring in all the team's new acquisitions enough.

Talent-wise, I would rate the Jaguars number 1 in the division- and by more than a small margin. The only position group that is a question-mark would be the offensive line, but even they should be significantly better than last year with the addition of Beachum and the return of Linder. The Texans do have a very solid defense, but if their q.b. was any good, I believe he'd be back with Denver. The Colts, despite having an elite q.b., have other concerns such as offensive line and their overall defense. 

 

In some ways, I like the dis-respect since it will motivate the team even more. However, once the pundits get a look at the speed and talent on our defense, it won't be long until they are seen as a strong favorite to dominate the AFC South for the next 3-5 years, at the least. Am I being too biased, or is this optimism warranted?

You are obviously biased, but I understand. The Jags have indeed acquired some outstanding acquisitions.... at least on paper; only regular season performance will determine if what we've got is what we thought we bought.

 

As for 'respect' from the pubs... why should they 'respect' us? Our record indicates we've been nothing but a bottom dweller for years now. The media celebrates tangible success and we've not produced any in a long time. So what if we've acquired what we hope will prove to be some good f/a's and rookies? They've not proven anything here yet; until they do, all the talk is just hype.

 

Speaking for myself, I'm sick of the 'hype'. Until I see them 'bring it' on the field, I reserve my optimism.

---