Quote:It's being allowed to happen and policy isn't in place or even talked about to address it. The prime problem and a result of it is radical Islamic terrorism. That's what brought down the twin towers, the motivation behind the Boston Marathon bombing, Bengahzi, etc. etc....


Regarding your first point in bold, don't try to redirect the problem by saying that "there are Christian terror organizations or terror groups". This guy that did this act did so not by an ideal "hatched right here" in the U.S.. You also don't see massive killings or attacks from other religions including Christians. Offensive such as Westboro Baptist church? Yes they do exercise their right to free speech even if it is offensive to most people, but they aren't going around blowing people up and/or shooting them.


Regarding the second part in bold. Which side of the political aisle separates people for whatever reason?



What "shtick" would that be? The fact that we are at war against radical Islamic extremists? It's not a "holy war" at all, it's pretty much a fight against "good vs. evil".

What schtick would that be? The kind that proposed that somehow there is a difference between saying terrorism and redical Islamic terrorism. That mentioning the fact that this was a targeted hate crime while also saying it's a terrorist act somehow is "the wrong focus" as if by not mentioning the hate crime part it does anything more than make you guys feel a little better. And let's be honest with each other here. Nothing he says will make you guys happy. That's been clear since election day in 2008. That's the schtick right there.

---