Quote:The investigation turned nothing up and he wasn't ever charged with anything at all. What possible legal ground would you stand on to deprive him of his rights? He's innocent until proven guilty, unless you're interested in changing that foundational legal principle?

 

Well, given that he already mentioned in an earlier post the whole gun control thing, it wouldn't surprise me greatly if he was talking more about limiting access to guns. Speaking personally, I don't really have a big problem limiting access to certain types of weapons like AR-15's, but that is more an issue of damage limitation, not getting rid of the root issue of when nut jobs go off the rails. Not really sure how we totally eliminate the risk, or if the cost would outweigh the gains. (Thinking homeland security and airport policies as an example of spectacularly bad attempts at a solution).

---