Quote:You are still arriving at that conclusion based on your own interpretation of what you read,not the facts, which you don't know. Just because they argued and he jumped doesn't mean she was necessarily the "stresser". The stresser may have been the crowd, the season or a variety of reasons.

 

You weren't inside either his or her head. Just because your father suffered from depression doesn't grant you any special insight into this situation. There are many behaviors that fall under the blanket description of depression.

 

Every conclusion you ever arrive at is based on your own interpretation. Every. Single. One. So that's a bogus argument against any POV, Mr. PC. Also, I just said in the post that you just quoted that it's possible that her behavior wasn't the stresser.

 

 

Quote:I think if you used the term "A Stressor", and not the term "The Stressor" your POV would be better received.

 

Even consider tossing in a "maybe", or "possibly" here and there. (let's say you did that)

 

Bingo, I see where you are going with this, and I can't say you are for certain wrong.

 

I did. In the very post that you quoted.

 

Probably (or some derivative of it) appears in posts #14, #18, #32, and #37.


Statistical probability (meaning that it's not an absolute guarantee) appears in posts #37 and #52.

 

Maybe appears in post #37 and #62. (Admittedly #62 was sarcastic).

 

Things aren't absolutes makes an appearance in post #64.

 

I've been using forms of possibly and maybe literally the entire time because the pool of information is limited.


You know how many times bchbunnie has used any derivative of that idea? Twice. Once in her most recent post (while attacking me as if I'm incapable of being responsible for my actions) and once when she was quoting what I had previously said.

---