Quote:I actually think it's his only redeeming quality but that's not enough to redeem him. 

 

That aside, How do you all justify this stance after nearly eight years of deriding Obama as a community organizer who was not qualified for the office president?

 

This is an open question since a whole lot of you have written something of the sort many times over.

 

Annnnnd start your spingines!

Obama had no qualifications to run anything, let alone this nation. He was an unaccomplished state senator who had powerful backers who turned him into an unaccomplished US Senator after leaking sealed details about a nasty divorce his opponent had endured. In both positions, he was absent or not participating the majority of the time. Voting present was his greatest accomplishment in Springfield, and he was running for president for most of his one senate term in DC. He didn't sponsor any meaningful legislation, but parlayed his power backing into a presidential bid. The guy was completely unaccomplished, but he could read a TelePrompTer, and he was half black. That's all he needed to win the presidency against a downright weak opponent who was terrified to point out his shortcomings out of fear he'd be labeled a racist.


Obama is and always was a puppet. He was sold as some genius, but there is nothing tangible to support that. He claimed to be a constitutional scholar, but his presidency has shown his lack of regard for it. He was raised by communists, and surrounded by radicals his entire life. He's never run anything. Never made a payroll. Never produced anything beyond two autobiographies, one ghost written by a domestic terrorist.


To say Obama was an empty suit in 2008 would be an insult to empty suits.

---