The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show significantly less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show significantly less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.
Should we make a run at Kirk Cousins?
|
Kirk Cousins is quickly becoming one of the better QB's in the NFL with arguably less talent than we have at the receiver position. He will be an UFA at the end of the season and Washington will likely slap him with the franchise tag. That would cost us 2 first round picks and a high salary, but we have the money to spend. It would also mean the QB position would likely be fixed. We wouldn't have to gamble on if Blake turns things around or that we'd have to take a chance on another rookie QB. What are your opinions? Personally, I don't see a better options out there, especially with this weak QB crop in the upcoming draft.
We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today! |
Users browsing this thread: |
1 Guest(s) |
The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.