No on Bradley. 

Yes on Caldwell. 

No on Bortles. 

 

Bradley lacks the fire and discipline to instill fire and discipline on an entire 53 man roster. That's been pretty evident. He also seems to lack foresight in being able to adjust our schemes and team needs to the team personnel. Caldwell, I am on the fence about him but I leaned yes just now because I feel like, just from what we keep seeing in the social circles around the NFL between other players, coaches and analysts. You keep seeing people circling back to "This team has a lot of talent on it's roster, but it just doesn't make any sense". That's usually a nice way of saying "They've got a nice crew but they don't have a captain capable of steering them in the right direction". In other words, we're lost at sea under Bradley's leadership. And it's felt that way virtually since 2013.

 

I voted no on Bortles, because I just don't see him becoming our franchise quarterback. I don't think he has "it" as a quarterback at this level. He doesn't look the part. His mechanics may or may not be correctable or fixable. But leading the entire NFL in turnovers since 2014 and with less than 40 NFL career starts. He has to take a little bit more than 50% of the ownership for those shortcomings. He really does. Especially when you're the number three overall pick of your class and the first signal caller taken of your class. It would be one thing if his goofy body language, throwing motion and intangibles translated to less mistakes, more accuracy and scoring drives like we've seen with quarterbacks like Matthew Stafford, Philip Rivers and Rich Gannon (in the past). But, it simply doesn't. And that's an issue. 

---