Quote:I think Cousins is decent and in a bad situation in Washington. You seem to be trying to make my opinion on Cousins seem more loftier than it is however. 

 

If Cousins was in Philly on Kelly's offense he'd be producing at a high level too. Kelly's system/ coaching is a cash cow. If you think Andy Reid was able to SUCKER (thats right, SUCKER) teams with past trades when pulling the wool over peoples eyes with QB mirages like AJ Feeley, and Kevin Kolb,.....wait until we see what Kelly is able to pilfer in exchange for Foles, when a few moron GM's out there (that share your similar mindset that what were seeing from Foles is legit) get unsuspectingly raped of their high draft picks.

 

Let's recap:

 

"Kirk Cousins is better than Matt Flynn. Significantly, IMO." - The Mad Dog

 

"I'll take Cousins over RGEETHREEE." - The Mad Dog

 

"Put Kirk Cousins in Chip Kelly's offense and his stats are better than Foles." - The Mad Dog

 

"People act as if Cousins is chopped liver or something. He's good." - The Mad Dog

 

"If you don't like what QB are available at 33 at that point, then try to deal for Mallett or Cousins at that point." - The Mad Dog

 

"I would rather have Cousins with a 2nd than Bortles."

 

 

After all of those statements, to come out and say...

"lol....this board and its obsession with mediocre QB....smh....." - The Mad Dog

...is irony to the definition.

 

Kirk Cousins is a career backup. He is not good.

---